07 August 2005

Homeland Security is Light on Toxics

If the Anthrax scare of 2001 has left you reeeeeeeeeeling, the HSA / TSA has come up with the "lack of regulating anything that would otherwise be under my Aunt Arrah's sink" Act of 2005. The good folks at military dot calm report:
Only four of an estimated 60 biological and nuclear agents that terrorists could use as weapons are classified now as highest-level threats, federal officials said Thursday.
Only four? Wait a minute here. A friend of mine used to haul tomato[e]s and he had to have HAZMAT training. Does anyone else see anything wrong here?
To designate substances as health threats, the government must determine whether there are enough vaccines or antidotes in the event of an outbreak, or whether new countermeasures should be developed.

The four health hazards already on the Homeland Security Department's material threat determination list are anthrax, smallpox, botulinum toxin and the effects of radiological and nuclear devices.
Botulinum? Isn't that what every 40+ bimbo, pardon, woman is injecting into her...nevermind.
"We've only done four. And I'm told there are about 60 possibilities for material threat assessments. Is that correct?" Rep. Norm Dicks asked at a hearing of a House Homeland Security subcommittee.

Dr. John Vitko, director of the department's biological countermeasures office, said Homeland Security has focused first on the high-priority concerns.

The process of naming a hazard as a high-level threat is complex and lengthy, he added.
Complex and lengthy? Give me ten seconds and we'll be done with the entire list.
"This is worrisome to us," said Dicks, D-Wash. "Somehow, we need to move the process a little more rapidly."

The director of the National Institutes of Infectious Diseases told lawmakers that the lag in classifying the diseases "is a concern."

"I'm aware of how difficult it is ... in getting the analysis," said Dr. Tony Fauci, whose office is part of the National Institutes of Health.

"I agree there is a concern and it needs to be moved faster," Fauci said. He said the Health and Human Services Department "is clearly addressing that."

The Homeland Security Department almost has finished assessing whether three more threats - plague, tularemia and chemical nerve agents - should go on the list, Vitko said.

The department will begin reviewing viral hemorrhagic fevers for inclusion next month, he said.


In an interview with The Associated Press, Vitko said there is no specific indication of threats to the U.S. by biological agents not already on the list.

In prioritizing the agents, the department looked at "how much they infect people, how easy they are to get, what their effects are," Vitko said.

"I don't want to say there's a real scare," Vitko said. "The whole issue with the biological question is, there are lots of agents that are possible and within the access of terrorists. ... These are the ones of major concern."
Well, if you won't say it, I sure will. There may not be a scare, but there ceratainly is a lack of response on the part of the federal agencies.
Also at the hearing, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it was unclear whether there will be enough flu vaccine for the public this winter. She and others made similar warnings last spring.
"I'm not counting on it," Dr. Julie Gerberding said.
Was influenza on the list? No? Why not? Last I checked, there was the threat of a pandemic -- not epidenimc -- regarding the Asian Avian flu.
Last October, the flu-shot supply was abruptly cut in half when British regulators shut down a Chiron Corp. factory because of contamination concerns. This year, federal health officials plan to urge the elderly and others most at risk from the flu to be the first vaccinated.
To quote our friend The Florida Masochist, you people are knuckleheads.

Semper Gratis to The Mudville Gazette for their Open Post.

Links to this post:

<\$BlogItemBacklinkCreate\$>

BlogItemBacklinksEnabled> Links to this post